Andrew Jarecki admits that it’s weird and shocking he has been telling Robert Durst‘s story for therefore lengthy. Throughout 20 years, The Jinx director has explored the true-crime story of the New York actual property inheritor who was suspected of three murders throughout his life, which resulted in 2022 at age 78 not lengthy after a responsible verdict and jail life sentence was handed down in a kind of murders.
“Not solely does the story hold shifting and are there so many large human questions that it calls into play, however this entire Half Two is de facto about one thing totally different for us,” Jarecki informed The Hollywood Reporter when speaking in regards to the follow-up to HBO’s 2015 collection (which helped launch the true-crime documentary wave that also exists immediately). “A whole lot of Half One was retrospective, the place these are horrible occasions that occurred up to now. Half Two is de facto occurring when you are watching it.”
9 years after Durst’s stunning Jinx finale confession would set off a legal trial for him within the killing of his greatest good friend, Susan Berman, Jarecki and his producer Zac Stuart-Pontier returned with a six-episode follow-up, which releases its finale this weekend.
The penultimate episode targeted on Durst’s 2021 testimony within the Berman homicide trial. Following Durst’s subsequent responsible verdict, the collection poses a query that sharpens its lens on Debrah Lee Charatan, Durst’s widow who then turned the executor of his property.
Durst was not current for the studying of the decision as a result of he was sequestered with COVID. The one who knowledgeable Durst was Alan Abramson, the legal legal professional employed by Charatan. Heading into the finale, viewers left questioning why Charatan employed a legal lawyer ought to know that, following Durst’s loss of life — and his conviction being vacated due to a California technicality — Charatan is now dealing with a wrongful loss of life lawsuit from the household of Kathleen Durst McCormack, Durst’s first spouse who disappeared in 1982 and whose physique was by no means discovered.
The episode tracked the moments main as much as the responsible verdict, together with a key twist within the case when Durst lastly admitted to writing the notorious cadaver be aware, which was a spotlight of The Jinx Half One and was believed to have been written by Berman’s assassin. “That’s what prompted them to do every little thing they did after that,” mentioned the lead prosecutor, Los Angeles Deputy District Legal professional John Lewin, heading into the Could 19 episode. When Durst took the stand, he confronted days of cross-examination from Lewin, who picked aside Durst’s testimony to point out how he was, within the phrases of Lewin, a “pathological liar.”
“The lies get greater and crazier till they’re principally an enormous snowball out of a cartoon,” mentioned Lewin to the filmmakers, wanting again on the trial. In the end, Lewin bought Durst to confess on the stand, “I didn’t kill Susan Berman. But when I had, I might lie about it.”
When chatting with THR forward of the season, Jarecki mentioned he felt that Durst had a “compulsion to admit” in any case of those years. “I feel he knew that he had killed the individuals who liked him,” he mentioned, notably talking about McCormack. After he was convicted for the first-degree homicide of Berman — together with the particular circumstance that he killed her as a witness to a different crime, the killing of McCormack — Durst was indicted on the cost of second-degree homicide in McCormack’s loss of life. Nevertheless, he died whereas in custody earlier than a trial may start, leaving the civil lawsuit as the one remaining authorized avenue for the grieving McCormack household.
“She’s all the time been the touchpoint,” mentioned Jarecki of McCormack. “Her and her household. So, persevering with to inform this story was vital from that standpoint.”
Now, as The Jinx — Half Two approaches its remaining episode, right here is the second a part of THR‘s chat with Jarecki and Stuart-Pontier about Durst’s involvement within the follow-up (by the use of recorded jail calls), why they received’t surrender on in search of justice for McCormack and whether or not or not they’re really finished with Bob Durst. (Learn half one in every of THR’s dialog right here.)
***
How a lot had been you hinging on talking instantly with Robert Durst for The Jinx — Half Two?
ZAC STUART-PONTIER Once we bought these jail recordings, it was one of many extra thrilling moments of creating this season. You nearly get a extra trustworthy Bob, as a result of he’s speaking to the individuals who he cares about and trusts. And we get to listen to rather a lot about what he thinks about Andrew [Jarecki] and what he thinks about The Jinx. We get a extremely front-row seat with him the place, earlier than we had these recordings, this season was approach much less thrilling.
At what level when making this season did you get these jail recordings?
STUART-PONTIER It got here in levels as a result of a few of them had been used as proof. However the elements that had been used as proof weren’t essentially the elements that had been most fun to us. We liked when Bob was simply being Bob. “Have you ever seen me in my jumpsuit?” That doesn’t have evidentiary worth, but it surely’s unbelievable to see him in these moments, like waving to his associates. Andrew was mentioning complicity as a theme of Half Two, and I feel you see loads of that in the best way he interacts with them.
Robert Durst throughout his testimony in 2021.
MAX
Since you stored your cameras rolling after Half One, you had been in a position to seize the reactions of the individuals who participated within the collection at your finale screening. How a lot of Half Two was for the individuals in that room, and in search of accountability and justice?
JARECKI We all the time take into consideration the victims, and particularly in regards to the McCormack household. As a result of Kathie McCormack was type of an unbelievable individual. She actually was the hope of that household. That household has all the time been struggling in a approach, and she or he was the one that broke out. She was unbelievable with children; it was tragic that [Durst] principally compelled her to have an abortion. She had a extremely robust time with him. And nonetheless, I feel [she] was hopeful. Many individuals relate to her in that approach — they find yourself with a man the place they see issues and assume they’ll repair it, and I feel she felt like she may very well be actually vital to him and humanize him. After which she wasn’t in a position to and actually walked right into a buzzsaw.
I additionally suppose it’s vital to grasp that it wasn’t simply Bob Durst. If the Durst household had communicated with the police as a substitute of closing ranks; as a substitute of lawyering up, if they’d finished what you’ll think about anyone would do, which might be, “Oh my God, our sister-in-law disappeared, let’s get into it.” However the actuality is that they knew much more than they’d mentioned on the time, and I believed it was vital to proceed to discover that. That’s one thing that’s and can grow to be a extra vital a part of the season. Understanding Bob’s spouse [Charatan], understanding the individuals round him and bringing some measure of accountability there as nicely is a driver.
What we’re seeing on the earth and this nation proper now’s loads of complicity. There was once sure norms, however individuals have an effective way of claiming, “Effectively I wasn’t the one who did that factor. I used to be current, however I used to be actually extra of a guardrail.” Nevertheless it seems that each one these individuals helped. That’s a extremely highly effective factor, definitely in our minds now, wanting on the tradition and what persons are getting used to. Bob was type of forward of his time.
He’s this unbelievable spellbinder; he introduced individuals into his orbit, not solely by paying them off — though, he did loads of that, too — he discovered a solution to make individuals fall for him. He used his humor and hypnotic voice and introduced individuals into actions that even to today they are saying, “Effectively, I didn’t kill anybody. Sure, I did put $118,000 right into a suitcase and ship it to Bob when he wanted it. But when I believed he was responsible, I by no means would have finished that.” Effectively, was it a tip-off that he wanted $118,000 to go on the run? Was that one thing which may have raised a flag?
You need to see somebody who helped a assassin and say, “Effectively, I by no means would have finished that.” However whenever you begin to see who these human beings are and the way Bob was in a approach drawing in weak individuals, you understand that these persons are not all that totally different from us. And persons are beginning to say, “I might have by no means finished that. But when I had a sick youngster or a giant downside and my good friend was providing me $400,000 in a single type or one other, what would I’ve finished?” That’s why I really like that Charlie Bagli [The New York Times writer] line the place he says, “I want to suppose that if I had a good friend who was implicated in a single, two, three murders that I might recoil from that. However, who is aware of till you’re examined.”
An older photograph of the late Susan Berman with Durst.
MAX
That brings me to the truth that you bought many of those individuals to take part in Half Two. Earlier within the season, you shared how you bought Durst and Berman pal Nick Chavin on board. And it was putting to see you, Andrew, say in Half Two how the resurfaced audio from Susan Berman talking shortly after Kathie’s disappearance modified your perspective on one thing you’ve been engaged on for 17 years. How did you resolve how a lot you wished to look again at Susan Berman right here?
JARECKI I’ll reply on Nick. I don’t need to simply take his phrase for it that that’s why he participated, as a result of all these shapes are shifting and there’s all the time this attention-grabbing prism in Bob world. [Chavin said he missed an opportunity for fame by not being in Part One]. … Al Maisel informed me way back, “No one desires to die with out telling their story.” And Nick, clearly, was motivated about being the focal point or being well-known. However I feel that these interviews do one thing else. I feel they offer individuals the chance to actually stroll round some tough territory in a approach that may permit them to grasp it higher themselves.
And that’s why I feel these interviews might be so cathartic. In the event you see Nick, and also you’ll see extra of Nick, you’ll see that one thing is going on with him. He begins in a distinct place than he finally ends up. So the sitting down [for an interview] is rarely nearly what they are saying. The truth is that Nick was there for that first interview for 4 days, after which we went again down and interviewed him in Florida. And what occurs throughout that type of a deep dive — and it’s very a lot what occurred with Bob [in Part One] — is that they actually begin to reveal themselves. It’s an expertise for them, it’s not only for the digicam. They’re going by one thing and making an attempt to justify it or resolve it, and perceive it themselves. And that’s the factor that carries me by the fourth day of the interview as a result of I’m watching one thing occur. I’m not simply listening to a retelling of one thing.
STUART- PONTIER The construction of this season was rather a lot about Susan Berman, and we knew that as a result of the trial was going to be targeted on her and her position. The cost that John Lewin and the L.A. DA’s workplace charged was a particular circumstance homicide, which meant that Susan was a witness to against the law. And, what crime was that? The loss of life of Kathie Durst. So we had been very inquisitive about what was going to be added and the way way more may very well be mentioned about Susan Berman’s actions in 1982, and we had been blown away once we discovered that tape [of Berman talking about theories around McCormack’s disappearance]. That was a really real response from Andrew [after hearing the audio]. We had been collectively the primary time we heard it, driving again from an interview with Charles Bagli, and our jaws had been on the ground. It’s so fast, to have a tape of Susan Berman speaking 9 days after [Kathie’s death]. It actually modifications what you concentrate on her and performs together with your concept of, is Susan a sufferer? Who’s she? She’s not all good, and she or he’s not all dangerous, however she’s positively a really grey character. And weaving that journey of how a lot to inform the viewers was a problem.
JARECKI It additionally highlights the distinction of Lewin’s agenda and our agenda. It was vital for Lewin to keep up a sure notion of Susan. And Lewin was most likely sensible for doing that. As he says, you don’t need the jury to hate your sufferer. However, we didn’t have that obligation in any respect with the collection. We had been OK with that response. We wished to actually perceive her for who she was. And, I don’t hate her in any respect. I perceive that Susan was drawn in by Bob in loads of methods, however there was one thing very damaged about Susan, and I’ve compassion for her, however I additionally do see her as extremely complicit.
STUART-PONTIER We tried to place her in context, although. Embracing her previous along with her father, that definitely had an influence on the alternatives she made. Even once we’re not pulling any punches and displaying a fairly ugly aspect of her, we’re making an attempt to place these decisions in context and never decide them. The way in which that episode ends is one in every of my favourite endings, on Susan’s phrases: “Don’t let your previous decisions erase your current.”
Realizing the way you ended The Jinx — Half One, there are expectations about an aha second coming within the finale. Is that this really the top of the Bob Durst story for you, as you wrap this two-decade run? What are you able to say about what questions you’ll reply by the top and, are there any you continue to have?
JARECKI We all the time have some questions. However I feel this looks like a fantastic stopping place. It’s by no means not possible that one thing new occurs, or we make a brand new discovery. However I feel the holding again of the episodes [the final two were not screened for press], will not be as a result of we need to tantalize individuals. It was actually that we had been saying: what’s the correct quantity for individuals to see and hold it fascinating, and hold the revelations coming? So, there are revelations. However the entire rhythm of Half Two is simply totally different. It’s loads of surprises occurring in entrance of you the entire time, which is what makes it so fascinating for us. I don’t know if it’s as a lot in regards to the single reveal or the massive second, as it’s about this tapestry of reveals.
You spoke in regards to the battle you’ve been by, Andrew, in your relationship with Bob; your movie put him away, however you probably did get to know this man. The decision got here down after which he died so quickly after. The place are you in your emotions now?
STUART-PONTIER I really feel extremely lucky to be working with Andrew on this. We’re doing the podcast. We’re reimagining loads of this for audio. We’re going again to season one and speaking about loads of that. We actually are doing a whole accounting of our emotions on this entire saga. All the data is correct at our fingertips — the timeline, the characters, the clips. I’m nonetheless simply making an attempt to take pleasure in this final second.
JARECKI The phrase I feel you had been trying to find is a “cleanse.” (Laughs) I really feel that we’re going to remain linked to this story. One of many issues that’s occurring proper now’s that the McCormack household is in the midst of this civil swimsuit. You’ll see a few of it within the [finale]. However I actually care about how that comes out. There’s a stage of accountability the place they want a win. They should get to the top of this and know not simply what he did, however see some individuals held accountable in a approach they haven’t but. So, there are ongoing issues that I feel we’ll simply naturally be drawn to and, I don’t know, perhaps we’ll movie issues. We all the time do.
Kathleen McCormack Durst.
MAX
So your cameras are usually not formally down?
JARECKI They by no means actually are, proper? We went to the [Durst] sentencing listening to in L.A. and the courtroom was empty; we had been sitting within the viewers half. And rapidly, this door opened like 25 toes throughout from me. I can’t see something, after which I see the 2 arms of a wheelchair are available, and there’s Bob, being pushed towards me. I’m the one factor in his line of imaginative and prescient — he’s gazing me and I’m gazing him. I even mentioned to my good friend, “I feel I ought to be filming this.” Although it’s most likely not going to be within the present, these are moments that I need to bear in mind, if nothing else.
However I additionally do suppose it’s time to interchange this difficult drive with one thing else. We’d like this reminiscence! (Laughs) We’d like all this area in our brains. So, Zac and I are engaged on another stuff and beginning to consider that. However there’s no approach this subsides. I feel the un-Durst goes to begin to occupy extra of our brains than the Durst. However I’m not likely in a rush to eliminate it. It’s been such a studying expertise about human beings. It’s not only a story about this man; it’s about who we’re.
The Jinx — Half Two airs its finale Sunday at 9 p.m. on HBO and Max. Learn half one in every of THR’s dialog right here.