Concordia is a phrase that ought to have disappeared from the language the day the Concorde crashed. It refers to a sq. in Paris the place the guillotine stood and the place an obelisk now stands as an emblem of vassalage and submission. It’s a solemn and kitschy phrase utilized by those that function the guillotine once they resolve it’s time to cease and place an obelisk, talking of harmony with the identical emphasis they beforehand placed on blood. Whereas applicable for revolutionary toasts and archbishop homilies, Concordia is seen as an out-of-place vintage that nobody likes however hesitates to discard.
Like all trinket phrases, Concordia will not be solely an empty signifier but in addition arrives too late and accentuates the pointless. Within the context of previous dictatorship and political repression, Spain doesn’t want concordias like these proposed by legal guidelines imposed by the political get together Vox however somewhat justice and reparations. The legal guidelines on reminiscence enacted since 1977 aimed to bury the lifeless, a course of that was ongoing however gradual. The essence was to have the State take duty for the atrocities and bury the deceased in line with the desires of their family members. Exhuming stays from ditches is a democratic crucial unrelated to ideological debates.
Vox seeks to exchange basic justice with concordia, pressuring the Common Social gathering to adjust to its calls for. They purpose to drive an Egyptian obelisk, misplaced within the scenario, as an emblem of harmony. Vox’s insistence on concordia is opposite to true reconciliation and justice. It overrides the progress made in burying the lifeless with dignity and threatens to miss the significance of justice and reparations for the victims and their households. The emphasis on concordia is a distraction and a hindrance to the pursuit of true justice and accountability.
The legal guidelines imposed by Vox prioritize concordia over justice, shifting the main target away from addressing the atrocities of the previous and offering closure for the victims’ households. By pushing for concordia, Vox undermines the progress made in acknowledging and rectifying the wrongs of the previous. Quite than in search of true reconciliation and accountability, they impose a synthetic sense of unity that ignores the necessity for reality and justice. Concordia turns into a smokescreen for avoiding the uncomfortable truths of historical past and delaying the required processes of therapeutic and restitution.
In conclusion, the emphasis on concordia by political events like Vox is a misguided try and keep away from confronting the painful truths of the previous and pursuing justice and reparations for victims of atrocities. By prioritizing concordia over justice, they undermine the progress made in acknowledging and addressing previous wrongs, perpetuating a cycle of denial and impunity. True reconciliation can solely be achieved by means of a dedication to reality, justice, and accountability, not by means of empty gestures of unity and harmony. It’s important to prioritize the wants and rights of victims and their households within the pursuit of a extra simply and reconciled society.