Think of any “unhappy woman” in a movie. You realize the one: she wears dishevelled denims and band T-shirts, slams doorways and sits alone in canteens. And she or he’s nearly at all times studying The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath, a semi-autobiographical textual content that has develop into the final word signifier {that a} feminine character is both troubled, tragic or tormented.
There’s 10 Issues I Hate About You, through which Julia Stiles’ sardonic character, Kat, pores over Plath’s pages, and cult Eighties comedy, Heathers, when Heather Chandler is discovered lifeless with a duplicate beside her. It’s even referenced in Household Man and The Simpsons, with Lisa Simpson studying it. And it’s in Netflix’s Intercourse Schooling, courtesy of the moody Maeve Wiley.
Quick ahead to at present and we now formally have the so-called “unhappy woman” literary development, which circulates a Bell Jar-shaped fulcrum. Within the aftermath of #MeToo, the publishing world has fixated on books through which younger girls sort out some kind of trauma, often with covers that includes them faceplanting partitions or truffles. These embrace Cleopatra and Frankenstein by Coco Mellors, which explores alcoholism, loneliness, and intercourse work, Sorrow and Bliss by Meg Mason, which is about psychological well being, Boy Components by Eliza Clark – a younger woman takes pornographic photographs of males – and every thing by Sally Rooney. Hardly a one-size-fits-all template. And but, final summer season, there was even a e book revealed known as Unhappy Woman Novel by Pip Finkemeyer.
On TikTok, the “unhappy woman” has develop into a whole style in and of itself. One fast search of the time period will reveal greater than 47 million outcomes. Usually, these are quick movies showcasing the books with some kind of lingering orchestral music and a touch creepy voiceover telling you in regards to the which means of life and love and every thing in between. As for what truly defines these titles – if you happen to’re going off TikTok, that’s – it might be something from that includes a feminine protagonist with a psychological sickness to at least one who goes via a foul breakup. The time period itself is contested; no person within the literary world can fairly resolve if it’s a great or unhealthy label, with some saying it’s patronising or probably even somewhat harmful.
“I don’t need anybody overdosing on Ambien as a result of they learn my e book,” mentioned Ottessa Moshfegh, a stalwart of the style. “That is satire, this isn’t actual”. Others, like Finkemeyer, have embraced the style’s reputation, telling The Guardian: “I’m attempting to stability the meta-ness and the tongue-in-cheek references with me wanting to offer readers a severe, actual a part of myself with actual emotional depth.”
However what does homogenising so many complicated storylines from girls say in regards to the feminine expertise? That something too difficult or too nuanced is past our mental capabilities? That the gamut of feminine emotion is just too huge for mainstream tradition? Or does it say one thing extra insidious about how girls are judged and oppressed for being their genuine selves? God forbid we ever present rage, ardour, or worry; it’s a lot simpler to simply be “unhappy”. I used to be conscious of all this after I began writing my very own novel, Gold Rush, which was a course of that started as this development was taking off throughout me. Instructed from the attitude of the twentysomething Rose, the e book seems at how an opportunity assembly with a charismatic, male pop star turns into one thing extra sinister.
I can solely hope that readers will see my e book as greater than “simply one other unhappy woman novel”. As a result of sure, there are “unhappy” parts to it, however there additionally lighter elements that satirise the absurdities of fame and the egos that include it
Nearly all of the e book focuses on the fallout from one drunken night time, inspecting energy dynamics between women and men, in addition to the nuances surrounding consent and movie star tradition. It’s a fancy, deeply private story. And I used to be nervous about having one thing I care so deeply about being taken from me and diminished to a singular catch-all time period. Don’t get me fallacious, I really like the entire authors I’ve talked about and it might be a privilege to have my work mentioned alongside theirs. But when somebody had been to name my e book a “unhappy woman” novel, I’d really feel extra conflicted. And never simply due to the simplification facet. First off, there’s the fundamental sexism of all of it (have you ever ever heard a “unhappy boy” e book?) which faucets right into a wider, deeply embedded, narrative I’ve observed percolating round feminine novelists.
Secondly, there’s the idea that inventive work by girls have to be autobiographical, one thing I’ve already been requested numerous instances, feeling the sting of my creativeness being undermined every time. and one which undermines our creativeness. Then there’s the infantilisation; woman, not girl. After all, that is an more and more absurd conceit that’s endemic throughout the web: sizzling woman summer season, tomato woman summer season, feral woman summer season, sizzling woman walks, woman dinners, woman math… The tyranny of all of it is turning into exhausting. Nevertheless it feels notably insidious in a literary context, as a result of it’s as soon as once more a solution to squash our imaginative authority and to belittle our credibility, each as artists and adults.
![‘Gold Rush’ by Olivia Petter is published on 18 July](https://static.independent.co.uk/2024/07/11/22/gr.jpg)
Lastly, there’s the phrase “unhappy”; it appears pejorative. “Your unhappy little e book” and so forth. Why not “tragic”? Or “melancholic”? Or actually another authentic adjective folks use to explain a narrative, ideally one which hasn’t been snatched from the lexicon of a four-year-old? Why do folks have such a tough time taking feminine novelists severely? It’s one thing all of us come up in opposition to, too, whatever the success we’ve achieved; even Rooney, essentially the most profitable novelist of her era, has spoken about how uncomfortable she feels with readers aligning her personal life together with her books, through which feminine protagonists are sometimes pensive, esoteric loners.
I can solely hope that readers will see Gold Rush as greater than “simply one other unhappy woman novel”. As a result of sure, there are “unhappy” parts to it, however there additionally lighter elements that satirise the absurdities of fame and the egos that include it. It examines the trendy media panorama, classism and nepotism. It additionally examines the nuances of sexual trauma and emotional abuse, topics that I really feel aren’t lined almost sufficient in popular culture and certainly warrant extra of a descriptor than “unhappy”. Like all of the titles I’ve talked about, Gold Rush is basically a e book in regards to the feminine expertise. And somewhat than attempting to tie it and others in neat, little bows as a result of that occurs to be extra Instagrammable, maybe it’s finest simply to learn these books and categorise them ourselves, with or with out a hashtag.
‘Gold Rush’ by Olivia Petter is out now