In the identical interview with GQ, Zack Snyder known as “Man of Metal” his most grounded, naturalistic movie — an irony, he admitted, provided that the principle character is an omnipotent hero from outer area. He mentioned the thought of a crucible second serving to a personality floor themselves — even somebody like Superman who tries to search out an excellent final result in each scenario.
“He is acquired to handle the eventualities that come to him,” Snyder stated. “He cannot choose and select, as you’ll be able to’t choose and select.” Based on the director, moments the place a personality has to confront one thing “exterior your morality, your regular morality which you can take care of,” are essential. “If the character can reply in a method that solidifies his humanity, then he is stronger,” he stated.
The counterargument continues to be legitimate. Most main superheroes are symbols of some type, each of their fictional worlds and in our personal. Superman has traditionally represented the will to actually do good and scale back hurt — a real, passionate drive to make the world a greater place. Finally, it is the author’s determination to place characters in several conditions, together with ones the place they’re inclined to interrupt a number of unhealthy guys’ necks. The controversy will doubtless proceed indefinitely as a result of it is actually a matter of opinion: Ought to we all the time maintain our heroes true to the identical absolute values, or push them and see how they break? When it is a character like Superman, who’s had so many various incarnations, journeying off the crushed path is not essentially a foul factor.
No matter private opinion, it appears sure that James Gunn’s Superman might be very totally different from Snyder’s.